CO129-355 - Governor Sir Lugard - 1909 [1-3] — Page 268

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

COS

266

ntativo ditiw notxe 609

.IBYOTANG v not segnano boao7074

Excellency's letter of 16th March, after consulting with

antuse ,tisqaab ni em of one o

espnatu matbroqci ment

the Registrar as Head of Department. The effect of this

bis viaronoak Istmofob eris daiw geiston ob blwon eri taria

hellazne veng na “istru vany ATOV MÍAnoqo`q add Jand

T bortdrevo vbastris nav a bus,etku no XTOW BIJES

(ffaroezes que redom: mis olas humorɑ I vale nisl be motel

athujerg "tov asw di sÓSunns HAW em hlot har of sew ti as

eft tot noprettet: I Crazzismert, add to Stov sift or Ia-

1 Hobiw to fijannate i

was obviously to sever the Registry completely from the

Judges, and leave the advice tendered to the Governor in

respect of contemplated changes entirely in the hands of

the Colonial Secretary. My opinion then was

and is now,

for reasons given in my letters, that nothing could be

more prejudicial to the efficient work of the Registry. In

view of Your Excellency's subsequent action in connexion

with recent appointrmets to the registry, it is unnecessary

t

gindee .dees to *o*dol

[[wv. e*lup verof deat

nožýmazta Larosqe vach or

"ON

asy I možtos oft

to refer at length to this question as it has now been

wo neswred herans (9.2

sonsbroqea**o*

EU.S. 2

to moisa! ede dobɗw ni tloag: bus vous{faoxf

AOIJPĒM 8:2 Ra low as beesirundh saw tatrabet e

Bяw zł že 3 bonbasatan I

t

.JES KITOYOð sle of maghut wild to

hazal preccoo or brage* data modië &Ivanoo os Isirnasse

eut y be rotet nd ·Imo biror» zud ,ad Jon bliroria verit

cris had vera reits legemanaged 20 basf!

200 20 Tsarei aft [[sox* quo\" to & digarDA' BQ NI .abam

(ezna: 278qo (Ia nì seravio to viliouoq es era foral

Latrolo ela nabw JHAY of hire new

vijaiņa, mle galbeforİ

Tuoy to diɖetngis, dark are mort

erbaas

I

VIAJATOAR

settled in a way which is entirely satisfactory to myself,

and will, if future Governors and Chief Justices work

harmoniously on the lines indicated in the correspondence,

do much to promote the efficiency of the Registry which

stands in much need of improvement. I beg leave to refer

to my letter of 4th December, 1908, in this connexion.

9.

The point however on which I desire now to

insist is that when Your Fxcellency says (paragraph 2)

that "the issue was complicated by an instruction" which I

issued to Mr. Seth, it is, with deference, hardly an

accurate representation of ry action. Whether Mr. Seth had

interviews with the Colonial Secretary subsequently to

22

those

Edit History

2026-06-07 21:30:20 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
COS 266 ntativo ditiw notxe 609 .IBYOTANG v not segnano boao7074 Excellency's letter of 16th March, after consulting with antuse ,tisqaab ni em of one o espnatu matbroqci ment the Registrar as Head of Department. The effect of this bis viaronoak Istmofob eris daiw geiston ob blwon eri taria hellazne veng na “istru vany ATOV MÍAnoqo`q add Jand T bortdrevo vbastris nav a bus,etku no XTOW BIJES (ffaroezes que redom: mis olas humorɑ I vale nisl be motel athujerg "tov asw di sÓSunns HAW em hlot har of sew ti as eft tot noprettet: I Crazzismert, add to Stov sift or Ia- 1 Hobiw to fijannate i was obviously to sever the Registry completely from the Judges, and leave the advice tendered to the Governor in respect of contemplated changes entirely in the hands of the Colonial Secretary. My opinion then was and is now, for reasons given in my letters, that nothing could be more prejudicial to the efficient work of the Registry. In view of Your Excellency's subsequent action in connexion with recent appointrmets to the registry, it is unnecessary t gindee .dees to *o*dol [[wv. e*lup verof deat nožýmazta Larosqe vach or "ON asy I možtos oft to refer at length to this question as it has now been wo neswred herans (9.2 sonsbroqea**o* EU.S. 2 to moisa! ede dobɗw ni tloag: bus vous{faoxf AOIJPĒM 8:2 Ra low as beesirundh saw tatrabet e Bяw že 3 bonbasatan I t .JES KITOYOð sle of maghut wild to hazal preccoo or brage* data modië &Ivanoo os Isirnasse eut y be rotet nd ·Imo biror» zud ,ad Jon bliroria verit cris had vera reits legemanaged 20 basf! 200 20 Tsarei aft [[sox* quo\" to & digarDA' BQ NI .abam (ezna: 278qo (Ia seravio to viliouoq es era foral Latrolo ela nabw JHAY of hire new vijaiņa, mle galbeforİ Tuoy to diɖetngis, dark are mort erbaas I VIAJATOAR settled in a way which is entirely satisfactory to myself, and will, if future Governors and Chief Justices work harmoniously on the lines indicated in the correspondence, do much to promote the efficiency of the Registry which stands in much need of improvement. I beg leave to refer to my letter of 4th December, 1908, in this connexion. 9. The point however on which I desire now to insist is that when Your Fxcellency says (paragraph 2) that "the issue was complicated by an instruction" which I issued to Mr. Seth, it is, with deference, hardly an accurate representation of ry action. Whether Mr. Seth had interviews with the Colonial Secretary subsequently to 22 those
Baseline (Original)
COS 266 ntativo ditiw notxe 609 .IBYOTANG v not segnano boao7074 Excellency's letter of 16th. March, after consulting with antuse ,tisqaab ni em of one o espnatu matbroqci ment the Registrar as Head of Department. The effect of this bis viaronoak Istmofob eris daiw geiston ob blwon eri taria hellazne veng na “istru vany ATOV MÍAnoqo`q add Jand T bortdrevo vbastris nav a bus,etku no XTOW BIJES (ffaroezes que redom: mis olas humorɑ I vale nisl be motel athujerg "tov asw di sÓSunns HAW em hlot har of sew ti as eft tot noprettet: I Crazzismert, add to Stov sift or Ia- 1 Hobiw to fijannate i was obviously to sever the Registry completely from the Judges, and leave the advice tendered to the Governor in respect of contemplated changes entirely in the hands of the Colonial Secretary. My opinion then was and is now, for reasons given in my letters, that nothing could be more prejudicial to the efficient work of the Registry. In view of Your Excellency's subsequent action in connexion with recent appointrmets to the registry, it is unnecessary t gindee .dees to *o*dol [[wv. e*lup verof deat nožýmazta Larosqe vach or "ON asy I možtos oft to refer at length to this question as it has now been wo neswred herans (9.2 sonsbroqea**o* EU.S. 2 to moisa! ede dobɗw ni tloag: bus vous{faoxf AOIJPĒM 8:2 Ra low as beesirundh saw tatrabet e Bяw że 3 bonbasatan I t .JES KITOYOð sle of maghut wild to hazal preccoo or brage* data modië &Ivanoo os Isirnasse eut y be rotet nd ·Imo biror» zud ,ad Jon bliroria verit cris had vera reits legemanaged 20 basf! 200 20 Tsarei aft [[sox* quo\" to & digarDA' BQ NI .abam (ezna: 278qo (Ia seravio to viliouoq es era foral Latrolo ela nabw JHAY of hire new vijaiņa, mle galbeforİ Tuoy to diɖetngis, dark are mort erbaas I VIAJATOAR settled in a way which is entirely satisfactory to myself, and will, if future Governors and Chief Justices work harmoniously on the lines indicated in the correspondence, do much to promote the efficiency of the Registry which stands in much need of improvement. I beg leave to refer to my letter of 4th. December, 1908, in this connexion. 9. The point however on which I desire now to insist is that when Your Fxcellency says (paragraph 2) that "the issue was complicated by an instruction" which I issued to Mr. Seth, it is, with deference, hardly an accurate representation of ry action. Whether Mr. Seth had interviews with the Colonial Secretary subsequently to 22 those
2026-06-07 21:30:20 · Baseline
View content

COS

266

ntativo ditiw notxe 609

.IBYOTANG v not segnano boao7074

Excellency's letter of 16th. March, after consulting with

antuse ,tisqaab ni em of one o

espnatu matbroqci ment

the Registrar as Head of Department. The effect of this

bis viaronoak Istmofob eris daiw geiston ob blwon eri taria

hellazne veng na “istru vany ATOV MÍAnoqo`q add Jand

T bortdrevo vbastris nav a bus,etku no XTOW BIJES

(ffaroezes que redom: mis olas humorɑ I vale nisl be motel

athujerg "tov asw di sÓSunns HAW em hlot har of sew ti as

eft tot noprettet: I Crazzismert, add to Stov sift or Ia-

1 Hobiw to fijannate i

was obviously to sever the Registry completely from the

Judges, and leave the advice tendered to the Governor in

respect of contemplated changes entirely in the hands of

the Colonial Secretary. My opinion then was

and is now,

for reasons given in my letters, that nothing could be

more prejudicial to the efficient work of the Registry. In

view of Your Excellency's subsequent action in connexion

with recent appointrmets to the registry, it is unnecessary

t

gindee .dees to *o*dol

[[wv. e*lup verof deat

nožýmazta Larosqe vach or

"ON

asy I možtos oft

to refer at length to this question as it has now been

wo neswred herans (9.2

sonsbroqea**o*

EU.S. 2

to moisa! ede dobɗw ni tloag: bus vous{faoxf

AOIJPĒM 8:2 Ra low as beesirundh saw tatrabet e

Bяw zł że 3 bonbasatan I

t

.JES KITOYOð sle of maghut wild to

hazal preccoo or brage* data modië &Ivanoo os Isirnasse

eut y be rotet nd ·Imo biror» zud ,ad Jon bliroria verit

cris had vera reits legemanaged 20 basf!

200 20 Tsarei aft [[sox* quo\" to & digarDA' BQ NI .abam

(ezna: 278qo (Ia nì seravio to viliouoq es era foral

Latrolo ela nabw JHAY of hire new

vijaiņa, mle galbeforİ

Tuoy to diɖetngis, dark are mort

erbaas

I

VIAJATOAR

settled in a way which is entirely satisfactory to myself,

and will, if future Governors and Chief Justices work

harmoniously on the lines indicated in the correspondence,

do much to promote the efficiency of the Registry which

stands in much need of improvement. I beg leave to refer

to my letter of 4th. December, 1908, in this connexion.

9.

The point however on which I desire now to

insist is that when Your Fxcellency says (paragraph 2)

that "the issue was complicated by an instruction" which I

issued to Mr. Seth, it is, with deference, hardly an

accurate representation of ry action. Whether Mr. Seth had

interviews with the Colonial Secretary subsequently to

22

those

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.